Bark Review

Is Bark good for buying/selling creative services?

For Designers/Sellers*


For Clients/Buyers*


Bark is an online service that generates leads for businesses and finds suppliers for clients. We spent several months thoroughly testing the service to see how well it works for both buyers and sellers. (See their website)

On the surface, it seems like a good idea, but it wasn’t long until cracks started to appear.

Bark Review

*Note: that we only base this review on creative/marketing services. Bark provides leads on many services, the efficacy of which we cannot fairly assess.

Leads must come from somewhere, and they often come with a cost. Many designers and developers will spend money on advertising to generate leads.

The theory behind Bark is connecting suppliers with people who are interested in buying their services. It costs sellers a fee every time you contact a potential buyer.

The Quality of the Leads

Lead quality is extremely important. Poor quality leads are usually characterised as projects with very low budgets or clients with only a vague interest in actually commissioning work.

Unfortunately, Bark has a couple of fatal flaws which result in an inferior quality of lead.


Businesses that use AdWords will be familiar with negative keywords. Negative keywords are specified when you don’t want your ad to appear. For example, a typical negative keyword is ‘cheap’, so someone offering a high standard of logo design wouldn’t want to pay for clicks from people searching for ‘cheap logo design’.

Bark doesn’t apply these standards to generating its leads.

Vague Briefs & No Option to Specify a Budget

Buyers can only provide a very succinct brief, but more importantly, they are not given the option to specify a budget. As a result, sellers have no idea whether their level of service is a match with potential buyers.

Bark does inform both the potential buyer and seller of the “estimated” cost of the services they are looking for, and those estimates are pretty low and wildly speculative given the limited brief.

Example BriefThis is the basic details sellers receive. Note the absence of a budget.


Worthless Review System

As a test, we added some legitimate reviews from customers and found that there was absolutely no validation process to the review system. If they wanted to, a seller could just leave countless illegitimate reviews for their own services.

As a bare minimum, most review sites will send an email to the address that a reviewer provides, and the review won’t be published until a link is clicked within the confirmation email. Other more established sites, such a Trust Pilot will flag reviews that come from the same IP address. Bark’s failure to do any of this makes the review system pointless and potentially misleading to potential buyers.

While we’re on the subject of fake reviews, Bark paid Nick Hewer (of The Apprentice and Countdown) to do a promotional video for their site. They then took a line of his script and posted it on their homepage like it was a testimonial! (Note – since writing this review both the videos and the testimonials from Nick Hewer have been removed from the site).

Bark Nick Hewer

The “Premium” Package

Bark charges sellers to contact potential buyers using a credits system. In addition to this, they also have something they call their ‘Elite Pro’ package which, at the time of writing, is £239 per year.

It’s not unusual for a service like Bark to have a premium echelon for sellers, but the way that they sell it is dishonest to both buyers and sellers.

There is no qualification required to become an “elite seller”, yet the web states “The Elite profile has been specially designed to show our users you’re one of the best professionals on Bark.” In reality, the only thing it actually shows potential buyers is that you used to have £239!

A system like should be reserved for sellers who have multiple confirmed and successful tenders via the platform.

Elite Pro

The Redeeming Features

The website is well designed and makes the process of posting tenders and responding to them easy for buyers and sellers respectively.

As mentioned earlier, we primarily tested the platform for design and marketing services. In all likelihood, the may work well for other industries.

What would it take to fix Bark?

  • Legitimise the review system
  • Reserve the “Elite” system for supplier with a proven record of accomplishment on the platform
  • Improve the quality of the leads
  • Allow buyers to specify a budget

Should you use

In its present state, Bark currently has little use for designers and developers who wish to target mid to upper-level projects/clients.

From a seller’s point of view, it might be suited to students and fledgeling suppliers looking to get their foot on the design ladder.

From a buyer’s perspective, it could suit those looking for help with a low-budget project, but even then, they would be better off doing their due diligence via other channels, such a Google search.